S1_Fig.pdf

Immunoblot examining Pvr, phospho-histone H3, and total histone H3 after two days with no treatment or two days of Pvr or GFP dsRNA treatment. Samples of equal numbers of cells were loaded.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s001 S2_Fig.pdf

Summary of dsRNA-mediated knockdown efficiencies assessed by quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) or immunoblot.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s002 S3_Fig.pdf

Plotted (y-axis) is the level of Pvf2 transcript remaining in Kc cells treated with dsRNA targeting Akt relative to a dsRNA targeting GFP. For normalization, Ribosomal protein L32 was used as a reference gene.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s003 S4_Fig.pdf

Live/dead cell counting performed after silencing of 22 Pvr Suppressors or insulin stimulation in combination with Pvr, and compared to Pvr and GFP (control) knockdown.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s004 S5_Fig.pdf

Immunoblot examining Pvr after treatment of Kc and Kcp35 cells with 0.01 ug/ml 20HE for three days.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s005 S6_Fig.pdf

Plotted (y-axis) is the level of rpr or E93 transcript remaining in Kc cells treated with dsRNA targeting Pvr or EcR relative to a dsRNA targeting GFP. For normalization, Ribosomal protein L32 was used as a reference gene. Two non-overlapping qPCR primers for each gene were used. No significant changes were observed.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s006 S7_Fig.pdf

Live hemocyte counts of embryos and larvae at the indicated times after egg laying (AEL), grown at 25C. UAS-Stinger; Pxn-GAL4 was crossed to w1118 (control), or UAS-EcRA dn, respectively. Note that around the time of hatching (grey bar), hemocyte numbers have dropped to about 60% of embryonic counts. Hemocyte-specific expression of UAS-EcRA dn does not significantly protect hemocytes from the decline, as indicated for 22h AEL.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s007 S8_Fig.pdf

Immunoblot confirming knockdown of Pvr and EcR (top panels) after two days dsRNA treatment in Kc cells used for phosphoproteomic analysis by mass spectrometry.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s008 S1_Table.xls

Amplicons of primary Pvr modifier screen with resulting ZDiff > = 2 or Pvr Enhancers, Suppressors, and Upstream Regulators are indicated.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s009 S2_Table.xls

Verification screen amplicons, Z scores of all replicates with resulting ZDiff values. Homologs and Scores predicted using DIOPT—DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool (www.flyrnai.org/cgi-bin/DRSC_orthologs.pl)

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s010 S3_Table.xls

Final scores ZDiffFinal resulting from equally averaging all amplicons of a gene in the primary and secondary screen.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s011 S4_Table.xlsx

Phosphosites identified in Kc cells, a condition of unaltered Pvr activity (‘high Pvr’), in combination with EcR knockdown (‘low EcR’) or insulin stimulation (‘high InR’). Duplicate samples were examined.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s012 S5_Table.xlsx

Phosphosites identified in Pvr RNAi cells, in combination with EcR knockdown (‘low EcR’) or insulin stimulation (‘high InR’). Duplicate samples were examined.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s013 S6_Table.xlsx

Phosphosites identified in direct comparison of Kc cells treated with control or Pvr dsRNAs, in combination with EcR knockdown (‘low EcR’) or insulin stimulation (‘high InR’).

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s014 S7_Table.xlsx

Phosphosites predicted to be targeted by both Pvr or InR, based on their common directionality of change under conditions of ‘high Pvr, low InR’ and ‘low Pvr, high InR’.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s015 S8_Table.xlsx

Phosphosites predicted to be targeted by either Pvr or InR specifically, based on their directionality of change under ‘high Pvr, low InR’ and ‘low Pvr, high InR’ conditions.

10.1371/journal.pgen.1005056.s016